3rd Quarter Update: Earnings, GDP, U.S. Dollar All Higher

Earnings for companies in the S&P500 grew by more than 20% year over year during the second quarter, repeating first quarter’s Tax Reform-boosted performance.  Companies that beat estimates were rewarded, and companies that missed either on guidance or sales were pushed down, but not to the degree we saw in the first quarter.   The increase in earnings has taken the market (SP 500) trailing P/E ratio down from very expensive 24.3 to modestly expensive  22.6.   Sentiment remains constructive with investors mildly positive, but below average bullishness for stocks’ outlook over the next 6 months.

Economic data is coming in mixed.  While GDP for the second quarter (4.1%) came in at the 5th fastest pace over the past 9 years, a large portion of this can be attributed to increased govt spending and the ‘pull-forward’ effect the Trade War tariffs have had on areas affected by increased taxes.   Adjusting GDP for these areas to average still gives a GDP read in the upper 2% range which indicates growth in the second quarter was strong.    The last previous 4% reads were followed by sequentially lower GDP prints over the following year however.

Real wages have stagnated year over year as inflation has increased its pace.  Wages climbed 2.9% while inflation is running at 2.9% year over year.    Wages had been the feared cause of inflation arising from Tax Reform stimulus.   The 70% climb in oil prices, along with healthcare and housing costs and tariffs/taxes being passed along to consumers are the actual drivers over the past 12 months.

As I referred to in my January Observations and Outlook, the US Dollar was destined to climb in 2018 after an incessant decline throughout 2017 (despite many factors that should have supported the greenback).   In January large traders were certain the US Dollar would continue to fall, and European and Emerging stock markets would do at least as well as US stocks.   Now seven months later, indeed the US Dollar has climbed dramatically while most stock markets outside the US are negative year to date.    The strong dollar has also taken its toll on precious and base metals.  Given the price declines abroad (and attendant airtime and print space) and US Dollar rapid increase, pundits are talking about ‘how bad can it get’, and reasons why the US Dollar will continue to strengthen, it may be time to again take the contrarian side of the dollar argument.

Valuations in emerging markets look much more attractive at lower prices, and no one seems to own gold anymore.  Vanguard recently shuttered one of its metals and mining mutual funds.  The price you pay for an asset has a tremendous impact on the return one sees, and currently prices are low.

Observations and Outlook July 2018

July 5, 2018

Selected Index Returns Year to Date/ 2nd Quarter Returns

Dow Jones Industrials    -.73%/1.26%        S&P 500   2.65%/3.43% 

MSCI Europe   -3.23%/-1.27%         Small Cap (Russell 2000)   7.66%/7.75% 

Emerging Mkts -7.68%/-8.66%     High Yld Bonds  .08%/1.0%

US Aggregate Bond -1.7%/-.17%       US Treasury 20+Yr -2.66%/.07%  

Commodity (S&P GSCI) 5.47%/4.09%  

The second quarter ended with a sharp decline from the mid-June highs, with US stock indexes retreating about 4.5% and ex-U. S markets losing upwards of 6%.  This pulled year-to-date returns back close to zero in the broad stock market indexes.  The only areas doing well on a year to date basis are US small cap and the technology sector.  Equity markets outside the US are in the red year to date languishing under the burden of a strengthening US Dollar and the constant threat of a tit-for-tat Trade War.  Areas of the market with exposure to global trade (US large cap, emerging markets, eurozone stocks) have had marginal performances while areas perceived to be somewhat immune to concerns about a Trade War have fared better.

Additionally, the bond market has only recently seen a slight reprieve as interest rates have eased as economic data has consistently come in below expectations—still expanding, but not expanding more rapidly.   Job creation, wage growth, and GDP growth all continue to expand but only at a similar pace that we have seen over the past several years.  The stronger US Dollar has wreaked havoc on emerging market bond indexes have fallen by more than 12% year to date.  And in the U.S., investment grade bond prices have fallen by more than 5% year to date, hit by a double whammy of higher interest rates and a widening credit spread (risk of default vs. US treasuries) has edged up.

On the bright side, per share earnings continue to grow more than 20%, with second quarter earnings expected to climb more than 20%, thanks in large part to the Tax Reform passed late in 2017.    As earnings have climbed and prices remain subdued, the market Price to Earnings ratio (P/E) has fallen making the market appear relatively less expensive and sentiment as measured by the AAII (American Assoc. of Individual Investors) has fallen from near 60% bullish on January 4th to 28% on June 28th, a level equal to the May 3 reading when the February-April correction ended. The Dow is approximately 800 points higher than the May 3 intraday low.

With reduced bullishness, increasing earnings, and expanding (albeit slow) GDP growth, there is room for equities to move up.  Bonds too have a chance for gains.  The meme of Global Synchronized Growth which justified the November-January run in stock prices and interest rates has all but died, given Europe’s frequent economic data misses and Japan’s negative GDP print in the first quarter.   This has taken pressure off interest rates and allowed the US 10-year Treasury yield to fall from a high of 3.11% on May 15 to 2.85% at quarter end.  I would not be surprised to see the 10-year yield fall further in the coming weeks.  Muted economic data with solid earnings growth would be beneficial to bonds and stocks respectively.

In my January Outlook I mentioned how the rise in ex-US stock markets followed closely the decline in the US Dollar.   The Dollar bottomed in late February and has gained dramatically since April.  This has been a weight around European and emerging market share prices and has been at the core of the emerging market debt problems mentioned above.  Fortunately, the Dollar’s climb has lost momentum and appears ready to pull back, likely offering a reprieve to shares priced in currencies other than the US Dollar.  It may also aid in US company earnings. So, while global economic and market conditions have changed since January, hindering prices of most assets, I believe we will see an echo of the 2016-2018 conditions that supported financial asset prices globally.   A declining dollar, muted investor bullishness, slowing global growth all should conspire to allow stock, bond and even precious metal prices to rise over the coming weeks, at least until investor bullishness gets well above average and the expectation of new lows for the US Dollar become entrenched again.

Looking Ahead

As second quarter earnings begin in earnest in mid-July, expectations are for approximately 20% climb in earnings.  A large portion is estimated to be due to tax reform passed late in 2017.  With market prices subdued and earnings climbing, the market’s valuation (Price to Earnings ratio) is looking more attractive.  While not cheap by any metric, this should give investors a reason to put money to work.  In the first quarter, analysts underestimated profits and had raised estimates all the way into the start of earnings season.  This is very rare.  The chart below shows us that generally analysts’ estimates decline going into earnings season.  Estimates start off high and then get lowered multiple times usually.   Second quarter of 2018 is setting up to be another rare event where we see again earnings estimates being raised into reporting season.
factset earnings 7 2018

The downside to the effect tax reform is having on earnings will be seen in 2019.   When comparisons to 2018 and 2019 quarterly earnings start to come out (in late 2018) the impact of lower taxes on the change in earnings will be gone.  In 2019 we will only see the change in earnings without the impact of tax reform.   Earnings growth will likely come down to the upper single digits.   How investors feel about this dramatic slowing in 2019 will dictate the path of stock prices.

Quantitative Tightening (QT) will dominate the headlines towards the end of the year.  Over the past 9 years central banks have pumped more than $12 trillion in liquidity into financial markets.  The US Fed stopped adding liquidity and has begun to let its balance sheet shrink, removing liquidity from financial markets.    During 2017 and 2018 the European Central bank and Bank of Japan more than made up for the US absence.   Europe and Japan are scheduled to reduce and eventually cease all new liquidity injections during 2019.  Combined with the Fed’s liquidity reductions, global financial markets will see a net reduction in liquidity.   This will have an impact on markets.  It is argued whether this will cause bond prices to fall (rates to rise) or it will have an impact on equity markets.   I believe it is likely this will impact both areas and the likelihood of falling bond and stock prices at the same time is significant.

US Dollar liquidity is another topic just starting to show up in the press.   The rise in 2018 of the US Dollar after a long decline has taken many market participants by surprise.  The “short US Dollar” and “short Treasury” trades were the most popular at the beginning of the year and have been upended.  It is often that once ‘everyone’ knows something, like that the US Dollar will continue to weaken, its about the time that area reverses and goes against how most are positioned.   The mystery really was given rising interest rates in the US and a stronger economy, why was the US Dollar weak to begin with?  Now the causes of a stronger Dollar are the weakness in Eurozone and Emerging market growth.    But which came first, the stronger Dollar or the weaker economies?

Below we can see the relationship of the US Dollar (UUP) and the TED Spread which is the difference in short term rates in the US and Europe.  The recent spike in funding costs (rates) parallels the rise in the Dollar index.  The rapid Dollar rise in 2014 was partly responsible for the Earnings Recession we saw in 2015.  There’s about 6 months to a year lag from when the Dollar strengthens to its impact on earnings.

ted spread july 2018

Ironically, part of the Tax Reform passed is a cause of poor Dollar liquidity (higher short-term rates result) and the strengthening Dollar.  The ability for US firms to repatriate earnings from abroad at a lower tax rate is causing Dollars to move from Eurozone back to the US.  Additionally, the $1 trillion plus budget deficit the US will run in 2018 and on into the future is also soaking up liquidity.  Repatriation, US deficits, and Fed tightening are all pushing the US Dollar up, and will likely see the Dollar stronger in 2019, which may impact US earnings in 2019.

Finally, there is China.   China is the largest consumer of raw materials.  Besides US PMI, the China Credit Impulse impacts base metals and other raw materials that other emerging market economies export.  When China is creating more, new credit we can see a rise in prices and in the growth of raw material exporting countries and a rise in US PMI with about a 12-month lag.  The chart below indicates that beyond the first half of 2018 the impact from the past China impulse will be fading.   This fade is happening at the same time global Central banks will be withdrawing liquidity and the US Dollar likely strengthening.   This scenario doesn’t bode well for risk assets in 2019.

china credit impulse pmi

Adam Waszkowski, CFA

Observations and Outlook April 2018

First quarter of 2018 turned out much differently than investors had been expecting at the turn of the New Year.  In January’s note, there were many sentiment indicators that had eclipsed their all-time highs. The highest percentage of investors expecting higher prices in twelve months was recorded.  Equity markets peaked on January 26 and fell 12%, followed by a large bounce into mid-March then subsequent decline that left us at quarter end about 4% above intraday lows from February.  We may be seeing the first stages of the end of the 9-year-old bull market.  Looking back at 2007 and 2000, the topping process can be choppy with market gyrations of +/-10%.   This is a complete 180 degree turn from the past two years where volatility was non-existent and equity markets went the longest period ever without a 5% decline.  Expect continued choppiness as the impact of Tax Reform filters through the economy and if corporations can continue the blistering pace of earnings growth going forward.  At the same time for mostly the same reasons, interest rates are likely to be range-bound.  Very recently the price of oil climbed on a news release that the Saudis would like to see $80/bbl oil.  Rising oil prices would be akin to a tax on consumers and hamper US growth.

Sentiment as seen by the AAII % bullish rolling 8-week average has declined from its euphoric high at 49% in January, down to 33%.  At the bottom of the last correction in early 2016 this average was 23%.  The current correction may be over and a lot of selling pressure has been exhausted there is room to the downside still. A reading in the mid 20% has been a good area to mark a low in the markets.  Sentiment is often a lagging indicator.  Investors are most enthusiastic after large price gains.  The opposite is true too in that sentiment numbers go low after a price decline.   It can be helpful to take a contrarian view as sentiment measures move to extremes.

aaii rolling bulls 4 2018

Blame for the downturn in January was due to a slightly hotter than expected print of Average Hourly Earnings (AHE), and the resulting concern over how quickly the Fed will raise interest rates.  The rapid change in AHE has not followed through into February and March, yet stocks remain well off their highs.  Analysts have been looking for wage pressures due to very low unemployment numbers for a long time.  The lack of wage growth is likely to the re-entrance of discouraged workers back into the labor force.  As a discouraged worker, who ‘hasn’t looked for work in the past month’, they are removed from the workforce.  When the number of unemployed decreases (the numerator) along with the total workforce (the denominator), the unemployment percentage rate goes down.  A low unemployment rate at the same time there is little wage pressure is due to the workforce participation rate being very low.  Focusing on the total number of people employed, which is still growing on a year over year basis, may give us a better read on employment situation without looking at the unemployment rate.  Any impact from Tax Reform should show up in an acceleration of year over year Total Employees growth.

total employed 4 2018

A more telling chart, and perhaps the real reason behind President Trump’s fiscal stimulus is the following chart. Using the same raw data that created the above chart, the chart below tracks the monthly, year over year percentage change in total nonfarm employees in the United States.  There are no seasonal adjustments etc.  While we are growing, the rate of increase in the total number of people working, is slowing.

% change in total employed 4 2018

Forward guidance from companies will be critical.  Expectations are still quite high regarding full year earnings and end of year price target for the S&P500, currently about 3000, 15% higher than todays price level.  During the first quarter, when earnings from Q4 2017 were reported, companies beating earnings estimates were rewarded only slightly, while companies missing earnings had their stock prices pushed down.  It seems there is still a ‘priced to perfection’ hurdle that companies must overcome.

 

The largest macroeconomic driver for the remainder of the year is the now global shift from QE (quantitative easing) to QT (quantitative tightening).   This global liquidity spigot the Central Banks have been running on full blast for the past 9 years has begun to end.  The US Federal Reserve stopped buying bonds (adding dollars to markets) and began raising rates.  These are tightening liquidity.  While in 2017 the European and Japanese central banks more than made up for the Federal Reserves actions, both have been broadcasting plans to temper their liquidity injections.  China is tightening as now in preparation for increased stimulus to coincide with the Communist Party’s 100th anniversary in power in 2021.

Over the past 9 years global liquidity additions has been the key driver to global asset prices.  As these additions slow and become subtractions, one must assume it will impact financial markets.  Most importantly global US Dollar-liquidity is the most important as the Dollar is the global reserve currency.  Recently the LIBOR-OIS has been in the news, having risen dramatically over the past few months.  This index is a rate that compares the overnight cost of interbank dollar borrowing in the US vs Europe.  The cost to borrow US Dollars in Europe has gone up dramatically.  A low cost would reflect ample Dollars for those who need them, a higher cost reflects a shortage of dollar-liquidity.  The TED Spread compares the interest rate on 90-day treasury bills and the 90-day LIBOR rate.  The TED spread is 90-day rates and the LIBOR OIS is overnight rates, and they follow each other closely.    The crux of it that they both measure the availability of funds in the money markets.  If these rates go up, it is seen as a decrease in available funds.

ted spread and us dollar 4 2018

The chart above tracks the TED spread and the US dollar.  The relationship is loose but fits well over multiple quarters.  If this relationship is correct, the US dollar should dramatically increase in value in the coming months.  An increase in the US Dollar will push the prices of non-US assets lower, make dollar denominated debt widely used in emerging markets more difficult to pay back and have further repercussions in debt markets.  A weak US Dollar is the underpin of global asset prices, and a stronger dollar, along with Quantitative tightening will be a strong headwind to asset prices in the second half of 2018.  If earnings can continue to growth strongly and more workers can be added at a strong pace, both leading to more credit growth, this headwind may be able to be offset.

In addition to international money market rates, the slowing velocity of money has been a constant impediment to economic growth.  Or, rather, the low velocity of money is indicative of an economy that continues to languish despite massive amounts of new money put into the system.  If the pace of money flowing through the economy slows, GDP can be increased by putting more money into the system.  More money moving slowly can be like a small amount of money moving quickly.   If money is removed from the system via tightening measure from central banks, and we do not see an increase in the velocity of money, GDP will decline.  The slowing of VoM has been a problem since 2000 and is likely directly related to ‘why’ the Fed keeps rates extremely low for very long periods of time.  Of course, if VoM were to return to 1960’s levels, interest rates would be substantially higher, causing a re-pricing of all assets—which is a topic for another day.

fredgraph

Adam Waszkowski, CFA

awaszkowski@namcoa.com    239.410.6555

This commentary is not intended as investment advice or an investment recommendation. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Price and yield are subject to daily change and as of the specified date. Information provided is solely the opinion or our investment managers at the time of writing. Nothing in the commentary should be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell securities. Information provided has been prepared from sources deemed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed by NAMCO and may not be a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision.  Liquid securities, such as those held within managed portfolios, can fall in value. Naples Asset Management Company, LLC is an SEC Registered Investment Adviser. For more information, please contact us at awaszkowski@namcoa.com

“Good” Inflation: Rising rates and falling stocks

Over the past week, the Dow fell by 4%, more than halving its ytd gains through Friday 1/19 (all time high).   Bonds continued the decline started in mid-December, bringing losses during the current ‘bond rout’ to -5.7% year to date.  That is a one week decline in the Dow of 4% and a four-week decline in long-bond prices of 5.7%.  Balanced investors have seen stocks gain and bonds lose, putting most investors (moderately conservative to moderately aggressive) at a mild gain or loss so far this year.  Generally, diversification across asset classes reduces volatility when bonds go up, stocks generally are weaker and vice versa.    When the classes move together differentiation across risk profiles diminishes.  Stocks remain in a strong uptrend and given the substantial gains over the past few months, equity centric investors should be able to take this in stride (or they shouldn’t be equity-centric) as 4% is a small blip in a strong multi-quarter uptrend awash in investor optimism, all-time low cash levels, all-time high exposure to stocks and financial assets and expectations of higher wages, earnings and GDP growth.   In this light, a rebound, or ‘buy the dip’ would not be surprising.  The new feature though is that volatility has returned.

The ‘bond rout spilling into equities’ explaination has to do with relative attractiveness.  If rates keep rising, bond prices are hurt, while becoming more attractive (due to higher yields) to equity investors, putting pressure on equity prices.  At some point, earning safe interest attracts enough investors from stocks to weaken stock prices.  The S&P 500 dividend yield is now 1.8%, similar to what can be found offered on 18 month CD.

Rate have climbed due to rising inflation expectations.  Inflation is expected to, finally, exceed the 2% goal set by the Federal Reserve ‘in the coming months’.  Current thinking is that a tight labor market is pushing AHE (average hourly earnings, +2.9% Jan ’18 vs Jan ’17), combined with more take home pay (via tax reform), will result in more spending from consumers and investment from business.  This will take time but markets have already priced it all in.  Just like the stock market has priced in exceptional earnings growth to match its exceptional valuations.  The chart below shows us that we’ve been in a tightening labor market for years without being able to hold above 2.0% inflation but briefly.

infl vs unemplmnt

Given the new feedback loop between stocks and bonds, perhaps we shouldn’t be so excited about inflation, even if its ‘good’.  On the bright side, the past few years has seen 3.25% as a top in 30yr bond yields and perhaps a decline in rates near term may help both bond holders and stock investors alike.

Oberservations and Outlook July 2017

Selected Index Returns 2nd Quarter/ Year to Date
Dow Jones Industrials    3.95%/ 9.35%          S&P 500   3.09%/9.34%         MSCI Europe   7.37%/15.36%

Small Cap (Russell 2000)   2.46%/4.99%     Emerging Mkts  6.27%/18.43%     High Yld Bonds   1.37%/15.3%

US Aggregate Bond 1.45%/2.27%   US Treasury 20+Yr   4.18%/5.66%    DJ/UBS Commodity -3%/-5.26%

2017 and its second quarter continue to be kind to financial assets, with both stocks, bonds and gold all climbing year to date.    European and Emerging Market equities have been the strongest this year, rising smartly after falling by 10% during the second half of 2016.  Emerging Market equity funds are back to a price area that stretches back to 2009!

Bonds continue to vacillate in an upward trend since mid-December. The commodity index is down primarily due to oil, as agriculture and base metals are essentially flat on the year after a recent climb.

Correlations between stocks and bonds have increased recently, with equities being flat over the past 6 weeks as bond prices have declined over the last two weeks.   While this phenomenon is negative for investors, equities appear to remain well inside their uptrend while bonds (and gold) appear to be near medium-term support levels.  We may see both stocks, bonds, and gold again climb concurrently reflecting a continuation of the year to date behavior.

What has been driving stock prices?  Growing earnings, low interest rates, lack of inflation, and ‘moderate’ GDP growth are the most common reasons to explain how prices have gotten to these levels.  Earnings have been on the rise since the end of the ‘earnings recession’ that lasted from June 2014 through March 2016.   After a decline of some 14% we’re now growing again, even robustly, given the low base from the previous year.  Earnings are still one or two quarters away from hitting new all-time highs, yet the S&P500 is roughly 20% higher than in early 2015.  The chart below gives us a visual of what prices rising faster than earnings looks like. Anytime the ratio is moving up indicates prices climbing faster than earnings.

shiller cape 6 30 2017Source: www.multpl.com

By this metric (and there are many others) stocks are valued at a level only exceeded by the roaring ‘20s and the dot-com era.  Can earnings continue to grow to support valuations?  The continued lack of wage growth and continued generationally low labor participation rate are headwinds to growth in consumer spending.  Consumer credit growth has slowed dramatically over the past six months and without wage or credit growth it’s difficult to see how the consumer will spend more to support ‘moderate’ GDP growth.  Low interest rates, or the comparison of low rates to dividend and earnings yield have provided much support over the past several years to the reasoning behind bidding up stocks faster than their earnings growth.

Interest rates bottomed one year ago at 1.3% (10-year treasury) and then ran up to 2.6%, mid-range since 2010 and the upper range of rates since late 2013.  The jury is out still on whether this marks the end of the bond bull market that has lasted since 1981.  The problem is that if consumers and businesses must increase their interest expense, there is that much less left to expand their consumption and investment.   Low rates had been a key enabler of more borrowing, leading to more consumption, and higher profits.  Now, in some areas, analysts are saying that higher rates are ALSO good for stocks because it represents growth expectations.  Frankly we’ve been ‘expecting’ growth now for several years, and the only positive representation of growth (GDP) we have seen is due to a willful under-reporting of inflation.   Gains in expenses in housing, healthcare, and education have far outstripped the general inflation rate.  At the same time, official statisticians tell us our TVs, cell phones, and other tech devices are far cheaper, because we ‘get more’ for our money.  This is called hedonic adjustments.  Look this up and you will understand why one’s personal experience with the cost of living doesn’t mesh with the official inflation statistics.

It seems the main reasons we are given for buoyant stock prices appear tapped out or stretched.  The thing is, it’s been like this for a few years now.  So then, what really is driving prices?  Some of it has to do with FOMO, Fear Of Missing Out.  No one wants to get left behind as prices rise, even if said prices already appear expensive.   As fundamentals have deteriorated over the past few years what is causing or who could be that marginal buyer who always seems to have more money to put towards financial assets? Perhaps this chart has something to do with it.

Central-Bank-Balance-Sheets-Versus-MSCI-World-Index

As central banks have purchased outstanding bonds (and equities in the cases of Japan, Switzerland and Israel among others) the cash or liquidity provided has found its way back into the equity markets.  Additional effects have been to put a bid under bonds, increasing prices and lowering rates.  What many investors in the U.S. don’t realize is that the European and Japanese central banks continue to this day putting approximately $400 billion per month into the financial markets.  If this is the true reason behind stock and bond price levels today, any cessation, slowing or even anticipation of slowing will likely have negative effects on asset prices.  The chart below shows where the U.S. Fed ended its QE efforts while Japan and Europe picked up all the slack and then some.  The astute observer can see where the Fed tapered, while the ECB was not adding liquidity, from 2014 to 2015.  From mid-2014 to early 2016, the Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF dropped by 29%.

central bank buying 4 2017

Beyond central bank liquidity creation there is also the concept of growth in the private sector.  Here too we see that a phenomenal amount of debt must be created to sustain growth.   New debt creation in China dwarfs the rest of the world.  China has put up high growth numbers the past several years, more than 7% annually.

private sector debt creation qe

Going forward it will be crucial to watch for central banks’ behavior as to ending current ‘QE’ policies.  Japan is still committed to a 0% 10yr bond rate, yet the ECB has begun to state that its bond buying won’t last forever, and is likely to slow by mid-2018.  The U.S. Fed has indicated continued tightening via rate hikes (likely one more this year) and to begin to let ‘roll off’ maturing bonds.  The roll-off will take liquidity from the markets.  It will start small and gradually increase in 2019 and thereafter.  These cessation tactics are done under the current understanding that financial conditions are ‘easy’.  Put another way, the banks will start to slow new liquidity and then drain liquidity as long as financial conditions, which include stock market levels, don’t get to difficult.   What exactly is the Fed’s downside tolerance is unknown.  What is knowable, is that the decision-making process takes months to be put into effect and by that time, markets could move down and growth could halt.

Near Term vs Long Term

The concepts of credit creation and central bank balance sheets and their respective monetary policies are will have impacts on asset prices over the longer term.   Year over year earnings growth forecasts, specific companies’ ‘beats’ or ‘misses’ and monthly data on inflation, job growth, and wages all have short term impacts on the stock market.  Currently, earnings are expected to grow robustly, official inflation is subdued and official unemployment are all in the “very good” range.  Combine that with the Fear Of Missing Out concept and that should help keep the markets up and even higher for a while longer.  The problem is that simply because we want markets to move higher doesn’t mean they will.  At some point paying 30x earnings will seem too expensive and the markets will lose some marginal buyers and some will become sellers, for whatever reason.   Based on current valuation metrics and the business cycle, we know that equity returns over the next several years will be very low.  If rates go up, and/or credit (the ability to pay) worsens for individuals and businesses bond funds will likely suffer as well.  Over the long term, avoiding large losses or drawdowns, even while lagging the market on the upside, can have a dramatic positive impact over a full market cycle.

What Can Be Done

If one suspects returns will be lackluster, and prices volatile, should one endure it?  The solution is at once simple and difficult at the same time given our cultural of equity ownership and the media’s constant focus on one asset class: equities.

Diversifying amongst the other 6 asset classes is a start.  Most advice revolves around two classes, stocks and bonds.  If one truly wants to buy low and sell high, one must identify the other areas that are “low”, increase exposure there, and reduce exposure to “high” asset classes.  Not only does this smooth out volatility but can increase long term returns.   Given the outlook for more volatility in stock and bond prices; very low prices (historically and relative to other assets) in precious metals, agriculture and oil; there should be many opportunities to take advantage of short term swings to benefit and move some ‘eggs’ from the equity side into other, non- and lower-correlated asset classes that are currently much lower in price.

Easier said than done, yes.  This is exactly why investors should seek out Investment Advisors willing to do this difficult work and that have a strategy to deal with changing markets.  For more information on how I am doing this for my clients, please contact me.

Adam Waszkowski, CFA

This commentary is not intended as investment advice or an investment recommendation. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Price and yield are subject to daily change and as of the specified date. Information provided is solely the opinion or our investment managers at the time of writing. Nothing in the commentary should be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell securities. Information provided has been prepared from sources deemed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed by NAMCO and may not be a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision.  Liquid securities, such as those held within managed portfolios, can fall in value. Naples Asset Management Company, LLC is an SEC Registered Investment Adviser. For more information, please contact us at awaszkowski@namcoa.com.

International Investing – Looking Abroad for Better Returns

With the upcoming Memorial Day kicking off the start of summertime, and 1st quarter earnings season wrapping up, it appears all is well and good, at least outside of the political kabuki theater in Washington. There’s a chorus of animal spirits driving optimism by corporate leaders and consumers alike, which is in turn driving business investment and household consumption and savings.

And it’s not only happening in the U.S. as we’ve seen strong earnings growth and positive surprises across industries and geography – evidence that we are experiencing a bout of synchronized global expansion.

To me, a more broad-based recovery is welcomed as it eases worries of a maturing U.S. business cycle that may not be able to do as much heavy lifting for the global economy as it has recently. And, given such a constructive global backdrop, stock markets around the world may have further to run.

For a U.S. investor, there are 47 individual country-specific exchange traded products (ETFs and ETNs — https://seekingalpha.com/etfs-and-funds/etf-tables/countries) that one could purchase to garner exposure to a basket of stocks in each of these countries.

Post the global recession of 2008 to early 2009, you could have easily ignored 46 of those specific countries and focused on one – the U.S.

You could use the S&P 500 as a gauge or a broader stock market benchmark that includes broader exposure to mid- and small-capitalization companies like the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (ticker symbol “VTI”), providing a more complete view of the U.S market than the S&P 500.

It is remarkable how the U.S. stock market has outperformed the rest of the world over the past decade. Among these 47 individual country stock markets at the close of 2016, VTI ranked # 1 over 10 years, # 2 over 5 years (behind Ireland) and # 1 over 3 years. Until last year, investing outside the United States had been a fool’s errand for an entire decade!

But 2017 may mark a turning point. So far this year, the U.S. stock market sits at a lowly 39 out of 47 with a gain of ~ 7.0% year to date (through May 23rd) for the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF. Of the other investable markets, 29 of the 47 country-specific funds are up double-digit percentages nearly 5 months into the year.

Home Country Bias

If you are a U.S. investor sticking with the U.S. stock market over the past decade has been easy to do; it also has been a winning bet. But the real reason it has been easy is that most investors suffer from a home country bias – the preference to invest in one’s own country’s stocks.

So what? Today, the U.S. stock market currently accounts for 36% of the world’s stock market capitalization; that’s down from 45% in 2003. So, if you truly want a balanced stock portfolio, you should have 64% (nearly 2/3) of your stock investments outside of the U.S. markets.

Does the idea of investing most of your hard-earned wealth in global stocks make you feel queasy? Of course it does. However, you should invest abroad for the same reason John Dillinger gave when the police asked him why he robs banks: “Because that’s where the money is.”

Global Investing Back in Fashion?

Timing the market is more for the lucky than the smart, but still reversion to the mean is the one rule of investing that, given time, always rings true.

Here’s really simple reasons why I think global stock markets have started just such a reversion.

#1 – U.S. investors despise global stock markets. Chances are you have no interest in investing outside the U.S. in either developed or emerging market stocks. After all, international stock markets have gone essentially nowhere in the past decade. If negative sentiment is a necessary contrarian indicator, you could hardly ask for a better setup.

#2 – International stock markets are very cheap. It is no secret that the U.S. stock market is expensive, valuation-wise, compared to the rest of the world. According to Star Capital Research, the U.S stock market is the 3rd most expensive in the world. Only Denmark and Ireland have richer valuations based on future earnings expectations.

As I mentioned earlier, reversion to the mean. Few things are predictable in investing, but given enough time, cheap stocks will get more expensive and expensive stocks will get cheaper.

#3 – International stock markets have turned up and you probably didn’t notice. Chances are you’ve been focused on U.S. stocks more than ever or the political scene in Washington. After all, the Trump Bump gave many U.S. investors a renewed appetite for risk taking, one that harkens back to the 1990s.

However, solid returns in the U.S. stock market year-to-date tell you nothing about how much money you could have made investing outside our country’s borders.

Is 2017 the year that international stocks begin to make their long-awaited comeback? The signs are as good as they have been for a long time. And, who knows, after a few years of leaving the U.S. stock market in the dust, international investing could cease to be a pariah for U.S. investors.

I suspect more U.S. investors will turn to looking outside the U.S. for superior market returns be it in emerging markets or in developed markets like European bourses where a combination of diminished political risks, cheap valuations, years of underperformance, and a European Central Bank (ECB) that is in no rush to hike rates make the region attractive.

The graphic below from Jonathan Krinsky of MKM Partners LLC and Bloomberg points out that a simple comparison of the Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-U.S. ETF (ticker symbol, “VEU”) versus the S&P 500 ETF (ticker symbol “SPY”) showing massive turnaround potential for the rest of the world to catch up.

After several years of underperformance, economic growth in the euro zone has matched that of the U.S. for the past year or so, and appear to be neck-in-neck (as shown in the graphic below).

U.S. vs. Euro Zone, Change in Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Year-over-Year

More than halfway into Europe’s earning season, 69% of companies had beaten earnings per share estimates vs. 75% of S&P 500 companies in the U.S. Overall, this is a fantastic showing.  According to Morgan Stanley, that’s the best showing in over a decade in Europe.

This marked improvement in economic growth is starting to feed through into corporate earnings and revenue. With 1st quarter results in from more than 250 companies, or about a 1/3 of European stocks by market value, the net number beating earnings expectations is on course to be the highest in more than a decade, according to Morgan Stanley. Those companies beating analysts’ estimates for revenue are set for the best performance in at least 14 years, Morgan Stanley added.

Total Returns, including Reinvested Dividends (in euros) of U.S. vs. European Stocks over Past 1 Year

The graphic above shows that over the past year, a recent run by European stocks (as measured by the Euro Stoxx 600 index) has caught up with the S&P 500 over the past month or so.

Total Returns, including Reinvested Dividends (in euros) of U.S. vs. European Stocks over Past 2 Years

On a longer-term basis of 2 years, however, there’s still quite a way to go before European stocks’ previous underperformance relative to their U.S. counterparts is erased.

The Case for Going Global

The combination of an improved outlook for euro zone growth, a benign inflationary environment and a central bank that’s unlikely to echo the Federal Reserve in raising interest rates anytime soon gives European stocks the opportunity to outpace U.S. returns.

Also supporting the case for European equities is the sheer scale of prior underperformance vs. U.S. stocks. However, the same factors also prevail in other major equity regions, especially emerging markets and, to some degree, Japan. However, political risk also remains a negative reality for Europe on a medium- to long-term horizon, even if the most immediate worries seem to have passed.

In many of my multi-asset portfolios, I have followed a geographically diversified approach to my equity positions this year, elevating exposure outside of the U.S. I view my position within the context of diversifying equity exposure across major regions, reflecting a broadening out of economic growth – a synchronization of global growth, if you will – rather than an outsized bet on European outperformance.

While there is a good chance that European earnings growth will come in as the strongest of any region this year, emerging market equities could well give Europe a run for its money in this regard. Japan, too, should see solid earnings growth this year, particularly if the yen remains weak, as I expect it will.

Valuations look significantly cheap for emerging markets as they do for Europe, particularly in comparison to the U.S. stock valuations. Given valuation metrics, the region that looks more challenged than the rest is the U.S. It is clearly the most expensive of any major equity market, and the upside to earnings growth looks somewhat limited unless we can get fiscal stimulus such as tax cuts, infrastructure spending, and regulatory relief passed by Congress.

But for now confidence remains historically high for businesses and households alike, which probably has more to do with expectations for no new anti-business regulations and taxes than actual legislation getting passed that would make it wildly better. With that said, here at home corporate growth (as measured by the S&P 500) is set to accelerate throughout 2017 to a solid 12.3% and 10.8% in 2018, according to Bloomberg Intelligence data. If that comes to fruition, that would be the biggest 2-year advance since 2012 and would help justify rich U.S. market valuations.

In an environment of strong and broadening global economic and earnings growth, I have assigned greater importance this year to being overweight equities relative to bonds, and I am looking to international markets for attractive returns. And while U.S. equities don’t look as compelling as other regions, I’m maintaining exposure a bit of home bias as there are offensive and defensive qualities as well as comfort that U.S. exposure brings to investors’ portfolios.

I wish you and yours an enjoyable summertime ahead and a reflective Memorial Day for those men and women that served and sacrificed to win or preserve our freedom.

____________________________________________

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and/or the sources cited. The article is for general education and information about investing and economic matters. Nothing should be construed as advice, nor any of it considered an offer or solicitation of any kind to buy or sell any investment products. We are not responsible for the accuracy or content on third party websites or sources cited; any and all links are offered only for use at your own discretion; and our privacy policies do not apply to linked websites. Eric Linser, CFA is an investment advisory representative of Green Valley Wealth, a dba of Naples Asset Management Company, LLC, a federally registered investment advisor.

Observations and Outlook April 2017

Equity prices peaked on March 1 and have been sideways to down since.  Interest rates (10-yr treasury) peaked on December 16 and were nearly matched on March 10, but since then have declined, going slightly below the range we have seen since November 22.  Gold bottomed in mid-December (along with bond prices), climbed to a high in late February and as of today, is pushing through that high mark.    On balance, risk assets have ebbed lower while bonds and gold have increased in price since the end of February.  Bond and gold prices have climbed back to their mid and early November (post-election) levels.  This price action speaks directly to the “Trump/Reflation Trade” we hear about in the news.

Trump Trade Withers

trump trade

Source: heisenbergreport.com
The “Trump Trade” is seen to manifest itself in a rising US Dollar (green), higher stock prices (purple) and higher interest rates (blue).  The Trade has gone nowhere since mid-December, and was decidedly weaker as ACA reform failed to pass in Congress

The past five months’ gains in the stock markets have been widely attributed to the policies the new administration hopes to implement.   At the same time, U.S. corporate earnings ended an Earnings Recession, that had pulled down earnings to 2012 levels.   In the fourth quarter of 2016 the earnings recession ended and had been forecast to do so since early in 2016.   Most of the gain in earnings was due to the base-effect seen in the energy sector.  Energy sector earnings plummeted in 2015 and provided a low bar for earnings to cease its ‘negative growth’.     The two concurrent topics that coincided with the latest rapid climb in stock prices were the cessation of declining earnings, and anticipated policy changes along with their presumed financial impacts.

For the remainder of the year, the focus will remain on these two areas:  earnings and implementation of Trump’s promised policy changes.  The repeal and replacement of the ACA (Obamacare) did not occur and its unknown when it may.  Recently this was seen as the gateway to then reforming the tax code followed by a fiscal spending plan focused around a decrease in social programs, a large increase in defense spending and a $1T to $2T ‘infrastructure’ plan.   With the defeat of the first attempt to repeal and replace ACA, the collective Trump Trade was dealt a blow and the remaining policies passage and implementation are less certain.

Tax policy and regulatory reform are next up and as the conversation around these begins, it’s likely that hope of tax law change will increase. The expectation that these changes will have a meaningful impact on earnings and disposable income will buoy stock prices in the short term.  Passage, implementation, and resulting impacts of policy changes are literally a multi-quarter process.  During that time, as I indicated in January, markets are likely to swing up and down several percentage points as hope of passage and fear of failure compete for investors’ attention.

The low bar for the energy sector remains low, and analysts’ expectations for earnings to grow remains intact, supported by the lower-than-usual reduction in earnings forecast.  Often a full year’s earnings forecast can drop by 1/4 through the course of the year, and when we see earnings estimates decline less rapidly the end of year reduction is often more like only a 1/8 reduction from beginning of year estimates to end of year final numbers.   Current 2017 earnings estimates are $119.80, which is about 5% lower than forecast a year ago and 1% lower than forecast at the end of 2016.   Continuing this pace of reduction, an estimate for 2017 earnings is $112.50.    IF that number is accurate it puts the forward Price to Earnings ratio at 20.9, which is higher than 90% of all other time periods since 1900.   Longer term forward returns from this level are often in the low single digits.

Over short periods of time (less than 3 years) investors often bid up prices well above longer term averages, which we have seen since 2014 and the start of the earnings recession.  Stock prices have risen far faster than earnings have over the past 4 years and its likely with growth resuming we could see even more extended valuations.

Other Considerations

The 30-year bond bull market is not dead.   Over the past few years, the idea that low interest rates were the ‘reason’ one should be accepting of high stock valuations (high p/e ratio, low earnings and dividend yields).  More recently we are hearing that increasing rates are also good for stock prices.   For rising rates and rising stock prices to occur together, there is a fine line to be tread.  Not too much inflation, not too much of an increase in rates while companies grow sales and earnings.   Essentially, we need the rate of change in the growth rate to be bigger than the change in interest rates.   Given the Atlanta Fed’s GDP Now Forecast shows only .6% rate of growth estimated for the first quarter.   This rate is lower than the past few quarters while the yield on the 10-yr Treasury has gone from 1.33% to 2.37%.    It’s more likely that along with stock prices, bond prices will vacillate within a range as policy expectations evolve and we await economic growth.

10yr tsy yld

Additionally, we have seen this, and higher increases in nominal rates without the bond bull dying out.  Some may say that as our national debt and aging demographics continue, our interest rate outlook may be similar to Japan’s experience over the past 20+ years.

While the US Fed has ended, its bond buying (“QE”) the eurozone and Japan continue to add liquidity by buying government and corporate debt of approximately $300 billion per quarter.

central bank buying 4 2017

This is referred to as “Policy Divergence”.  While the ECB and Japan ‘liquidate’ their bond markets, the US has ceased and expectations are that the Fed will tighten/raise rates while Japan holds their 10yr at 0%.  This expected interest rate differential leads to changes in exchange rates.  The changes we have seen since mid-2014 is a much stronger US dollar.   There is nothing on the horizon that indicates this Policy Divergence will end, which should indicate a continued strengthening of the US Dollar.

usd eur bund rate differentialSource: SocGen

This chart shows how the relationship between interest rates corresponds (currently very tightly) with the exchange rate, EUR/USD.  The future path of the US dollar will be determined by US economic and Federal Reserve policy vs.  ECB and eurozone policy and rate of growth.  Since the US has the early lead, ceasing QE and beginning to tighten, along with a new pro-growth President, it’s hard to see how the US Dollar will weaken without dramatic shifts in US and ECB policies.

In Summary

The outlook for stocks and bonds remains:  choppy with large swells.   Since November, markets have priced in passage of, and perfectly positive impacts from, Trumps tax and reform policies.   While at the same time, earnings have begun to grow anew, but are only at 2015 levels.   This combination has made today’s equity prices among the most expensive in history.   The Hope and Expectations born from Trump’s election are still with us, despite the recent healthcare setback.  As such, stock prices may very likely become even more stretched (higher) as debate regarding taxes begins and evolves into the summer months.

Bonds were sold off very dramatically post-election and will likely continue to gain in price as uninspiring economic data comes in while we continue in our multi-year vision of “growth in the second half of the year”.

While earnings may be increasing, the age-old question of how much are investors willing pay for $1 of earnings persists.   Their ‘willingness’ is often derived from feelings and expectations of the future.  If the future appears bright, prices can appreciate.  Sometimes this appreciation begets its own feelings and can lead to further appreciation without commensurate changes in earnings.  The risk there is that of an ‘air-pocket’ where future expectations are cut to match a duller present and prices move accordingly.

Adam Waszkowski, CFA

This commentary is not intended as investment advice or an investment recommendation. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Price and yield are subject to daily change and as of the specified date. Information provided is solely the opinion or our investment managers at the time of writing. Nothing in the commentary should be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell securities. Information provided has been prepared from sources deemed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed by NAMCO and may not be a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision.  Liquid securities, such as those held within managed portfolios, can fall in value. Naples Asset Management Company, LLC is an SEC Registered Investment Adviser. For more information, please contact us at awaszkowski@namcoa.com.

 

Observations and Outlook January 2017

While 2016 ended on a positive note, market volatility has arrived.

 

Selected Index Returns 4th Quarter/ 2016

Dow Jones Industrials    8.6%/ 16.5%                                       S&P 500   3.8%/11.96%       MSCI Europe   -.4%/-.4%
Small Cap (Russell 2000)  8.83%/21.31%     Emerging Mkts  -4.2%/11.2%     High Yld Bonds   1.37%/15.3%
US Aggregate Bond -2.98%/2.65%   US Treasury 20+Yr   -12.16%/1.4%                        DJ/UBS Commodity 2.7%/11.8%

A brief perusal of the above numbers clearly shows 2016 was a “Risk-On” kind of year with small cap stocks and junk bonds putting up substantial returns.  The U.S. markets in general were the place to be outpacing emerging markets and European shares as well.  What isn’t quite as clear is the fact that investors who were geographically diversified and sought to own lower risk/higher quality bonds are feeling a strong dose of ‘return envy’.  An investor with a 50% S&P 500 and 50% Aggregate bond portfolio saw ‘only’ a 7.5% return for the year.  What is also not seen is that the ‘risk on’ investor spent the first half of 2016 with negative returns with the post-election period accounting for approximately 80% of the year’s total gains.  To summarize 2016 in one word: volatile.   While the volatility ended the year on the plus side, it should give investors a moment to reflect on what they are willing to endure to see outsized gains.

Forecast 2017: Large Swells and Wind Gusts to the North and South

Often after a rapid decline in stock prices, conditions become “oversold”.  In the near term, oversold conditions often lead to a bounce or snapback in prices.  The opposite is also seen when prices advance too far too fast.  The rapid rise in equity prices has put the market into an “overbought” condition and, given the rise in stock prices based on expectations of tax relief and government spending to boost the economy, hope once again springs forth that today’s extreme valuations will be justified with a rapid rise in corporate earnings in 2017.  In the meantime, prices have already risen and like bond prices in 2016 are likely to fluctuate greatly.

Actually, prices in both stocks and bonds have already begun to make large swings down and up.  The year ended up, so the tendency is to assume rapid ‘up’ moves are natural, and of course welcome.   Early 2016 bonds and gold did extremely well as stock prices fell.  The roles were reversed in the second half with bonds and gold declining through the second half, while stocks edged up and the lurched up in the last two months.  So, in fact, we have already begun a period of greater market volatility.   It’s likely to see prices swing between Hope and Anxiety as we await the actual changes and impacts of the change in monetary policy (tightening from the Fed) and fiscal policy (lower taxes, increased deficit spending).

What outside issues might impact global markets?

China Overnight Interbank Lending Rate Soars to 105%

Money markets are the source of short term funding for the financial system.  Recently the HIBOR, Hong Kong Interbank Overnight Rate, has soared to unprecedented levels, yet very little has been talked about in the US financial press. This is the rate to borrow yuan overnight, for banks in Hong Kong- known as the offshore yuan rate.   This was likely due to the PBOC intervening to make is cost prohibitive to short China’s currency.  In the U.S., though,  we seem to be preoccupied with the number 20,000 to observe severe stress in the world’s second largest economy.

Source: fxstreet.com

The last time an extreme liquidity crunch was seen was one year ago, and global equity markets became very ‘nervous’.   This also coincides with the annual reset of how much money China’s citizens can send out of the country.  The Chinese are allowed to take the equivalent of $50,000 per person per year out of the country. There has been a significant weakening of the Chinese yuan vs the US dollar in an attempt to keep the yuan’s strength versus other currencies low.  Foreign exchange takes some effort to get one’s head around, but in a world of paper money, it’s an important factor in trade, profits and interest rates.

China is at the same time trying to slowly deflate a massive real estate bubble, while not effecting other areas of the economy.  Leverage, aka credit, is fuel for higher prices in all assets like real estate and equities, as well as some areas of the bond market (borrow short term, buy long term bonds and earn ‘carry’ profits).   It is extremely difficult to remove leverage and not have prices decline, yet this is what China is trying to do, while also defending its currency.  China is using its massive reserves of Treasuries to manage its currency depreciation vs the US dollar, and going through it at a rapid rate.  IF the rate at which its spending its reserves continues, China, could see its reserves decline by 50% in as little as 2 years, which is very significant.

China being a closed, autocratic society means data can be obfuscated, changed, and outright fabricated with very little complaint.  As such China is a ripe source of potential Black Swans in 2017.  We are already seeing very strange, even for China, developments in its money markets.

The Big Picture

Here it is…….

Take a moment and understand what this chart says.

Given the level of household exposure to equities, or put another way, the percentage of stocks in portfolios, has had a very strong predictive value upon the next 10 years’ returns.  As household become more heavily weight towards equities, the lower the next 10 years returns from equities.  The dashed line ends in mid-2006 because there was return data for the following 10 years, through mid-2016.

Households’ exposure to equities was very low at the 2009 market lows (people tend to sell after prices go down unfortunately), and indicated a forward 10-year annualized return approaching 15%.  If the S&P 500 achieved this, it points to approximately 2800 by mid-2019, an increase of 23% from current levels over the next 2.5 years.  The gap between the dashed and blue lines shows this is not an exact science.

I apologize in advance for the math here.  23% over 2.5 years is about 8.6% annualized.  If the margin of error from our chart above gives us only 13% annualized from 2009, that points to about 2270, an increase of 0% over the next 2.5 years; and if our chart ends up at 11% 10yr annualized rate, we will be at 1987 in 2.5 years, a decline of almost 13%.

A range over the next 2.5 years of +23% or -13% is much lower than the return the market has given us over the past few years.   The past 2 years has seen the S&P 500 swing from 2130 to 1850 to 2280 currently, while corporate earnings have been declining and recently grew back to a level seen in early 2015.  While 2014 was a good year, the past two years have seen major price swings and rewarded investors with only 5.5% annually for the past two years.   It’s my opinion that this kind of earnings levelling off, slowing of annualized returns, compounded by very high current valuations are indicative of a late stage bull market.   Past Price to Earnings ratios (see my blog post Definition of Long Term Investor), and the chart above also point to reduced returns from equities in the next few years.

What Can Be Done

If one suspects returns will be lackluster, and prices volatile, should one endure it?  The solution is at once simple and difficult at the same time given our cultural of equity ownership and the media’s constant focus on one asset class: equities.

Diversifying amongst the other 6 asset classes is a start.  Most advice revolves around 2, stocks and bonds.  If one truly wants to buy low and sell high, one must identify the other areas that are “low”, increase exposure there, and reduce exposure to “high” asset classes.  Not only does this smooth out volatility but can increase long term returns.   Given the outlook for more volatility in stock and bond prices; very low prices (historically and relative to other assets) in precious metals, agriculture and oil; there should be many opportunities to take advantage of short term swings to benefit and move some ‘eggs’ from the equity side into other, non- and lower-correlated asset classes that are currently much lower in price.

Easier said than done, yes.  This is exactly why investors should seek out Investment Advisors willing to do this difficult work and that have a strategy to deal with changing markets.  For more information on how I am doing this for my clients, please contact me.

Adam Waszkowski, CFA 

awaszkowski@namcoa.com

239.410.6555

This commentary is not intended as investment advice or an investment recommendation. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Price and yield are subject to daily change and as of the specified date. Information provided is solely the opinion or our investment managers at the time of writing. Nothing in the commentary should be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell securities. Information provided has been prepared from sources deemed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed by NAMCO and may not be a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision.  Liquid securities, such as those held within managed portfolios, can fall in value. Naples Asset Management Company, LLC is an SEC Registered Investment Adviser. For more information, please contact us at awaszkowski@namcoa.com.

The Definition of “Long Term Investor”

What is the difference between long-term characteristics of the market, and owning the market for a long term and how can an investor benefit from knowing the difference.

The phrase “Long Term Investor” is used quite often, and there are many definitions.  The IRS defines a long-term investment as anything held more than 1 year.  Most people though would agree that long-term refers to a much longer time frame, usually at least 5 years.  However, when we read about equity market statistics, we are shown 30 and often 70 or even 100-year time spans.  I saw a recent article with a 500-year time span.  Given the average human life span, and that our peak earning and accumulation years are from our mid-40s to mid-60’s, most investors actually have about a 20-year time horizon of accumulation.

A “long term investor” isn’t one who buys and holds for a long span of time.  A long-term investor recognizes the long-term characteristics of equity (and other) markets.  For example, over the very long term (+20yrs), earnings per share follow GDP growth, the average 20yr annualized return is just over 7% (with dividends adding to this), and that over shorter periods of time, actual returns can vary greatly from the average.  The long-term investor also understands that the averages over the more volatile shorter periods of time are the pieces that create the 20-year average. One can see the volatility, or range of returns, over shorter periods below.

1-3-5-10-20-yr-avg-returns-schwab-ctr-for-financial-research      Source: http://www.investopedia.com/articles/stocks/08/passive-active-investing.asp?ad=dirN&qo=investopediaSiteSearch&qsrc=0&o=40186

The periods when we most often hear the phrase “I’m a long-term investor” being used, unfortunately, are when stock markets have experienced a significant decline.  To assuage the pain of real or paper losses, investors will often claim this characterization, with the unspoken assumption that ‘it will come back’.  And it always has, if you waited long enough.   From Charles Schwab Inc., via Investopedia.com we can see that yes, over very long periods of time, 20 years in this case, the market always has a positive return.

The chart below shows us the extremes. The low seen in 1979 to 1982 at about a 3% 20-year annualized returns, and the late 1990’s, from 1998 to 2001 which saw 20 year annualized returns over 13%.  While still positive, it’s much more helpful for an investor to invest over the right period! But how can one tell when ‘the right period’ might be at hand? Or even better, when the ‘wrong time’ might, so one can avoid a period of poor returns.  While not widely disseminated, missing the bad times has a far more powerful impact than staying invested, per this study by Meb Faber of Cambria Investment Management https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1908469

avg-20-yr-returnsSource: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-average-S-P-500-return-over-20-years

So, while it is clear that, ‘in the long run’, if you wait long enough you will have positive returns.  From the chart above we can see that there are periods when long term returns are well below and above the 7% average.   How can we avoid being drawn into the low return eras?   Another long-term characteristic of equity markets is that Price to Earnings (P/E) ratios expand and contract.  That is for $1 in earnings, sometimes people pay $25 in price (a 25 P/E ratio) and other times less than $10.

For those well versed in market history, we know that the exemplary 20 year annualized returns seen in the late 1990’s, saw their birth in the low Price to Earnings era of the early 1980’s.  There are many studies showing how long term returns are borne from low P/E multiples.   Given that currently we are only beginning to enter the 20-years-later period after the dot.com bubble, we only have the first 20-year cycle from 1995, which gave us 7.3% annualized price growth.  Given that the late 1990’s saw large price appreciation, this acts as a headwind to the 20yr annualized returns in the next few years.  The S&P 500 started 1997 at 766 and if we end at 2200 in 2016 that will give us only 5.4% 20yr returns.  The S&P500 started 1998 at 963, and to maintain the 5.4% 20yr returns, the S&P500 would need to end 2017 at 2765, a gain of more than 25%!    The propensity is for the 20 year annualized returns to continue the downward slope that began in 2002 and likely repeat the bottoms like 1980, 1949 and four other periods where long term (20yr+) returns were very low.  The chart below is from Barry Ritholtz.

rolling-20-yr-returns-ritholzSource: http://ritholtz.com/2011/12/dow-jones-industial-average/

The results since this chart was created in 2010 are indeed following the red dashed line down.  Knowing that the market in 2000 was amongst the most expensive ever (highest P/E ratio) it should be considered that the 20 years ending in 2020 may see results that are amongst the worst in the past 100 years.  To have 0% return from 2000 to 2020, the S&P 500 would only need to decline by 31%, about the average for a bear market.   To have 2.5% annualized return from January 2000 to January 2020, the S&P500 would end 2019 at 2335, a change of about 6%, or only 2% annually.    The moral of the story is outlook for equity returns over the next 2-3 years is low and likely volatile, not a good risk to return prospect.

What Should One Do?

While 20yr annualized returns are slow moving data points, it’s clear that the long-term average is in decline.  Paying a high price (high P/E multiple) leads to poor long term returns is a slow lesson investors simply don’t have the time to learn from experience, and that many Baby Boomers can ill afford to learn now.

Knowing, or rather, expecting returns from stocks to be low going forward will enable an investor to seek returns from other asset classes.   Few Investment Advisors currently work with models outside of the traditional stock/bond portfolio mix.   An Advisor who recognizes that there are indeed 7 asset classes with which to pursue returns has an advantage.  Being successful at putting that understanding to work, is, indeed, the work of portfolio management.

Investors who want to earn returns in the medium term should look to other asset classes for returns, ideally ones that meet the ‘low’ metric for their markets.   True diversification is the call today, not simply bonds and stocks, but also commodities like oil and agriculture, precious metals and even cash.

If you would like more information on my Volatility Based Dynamic Asset Allocation process that seeks positive gains regardless of how equity or bond markets perform, contact me via email at awaszkowski@namcoa.com.

Adam Waszkowski, CFA

This commentary is not intended as investment advice or an investment recommendation. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Price and yield are subject to daily change and as of the specified date. Information provided is solely the opinion or our investment managers at the time of writing. Nothing in the commentary should be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell securities. Information provided has been prepared from sources deemed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed by NAMCO and may not be a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision.  Liquid securities, such as those held within managed portfolios, can fall in value. Naples Asset Management Company, LLC is an SEC Registered Investment Adviser. For more information, please contact us at awaszkowski@namcoa.com.